EMFBase

ANSES 2018 — collective expert review of electromagnetic hypersensitivity

France's health agency reviewed the literature plus hearings with clinicians, researchers and affected people: no solid experimental evidence of a causal link, and an explicit recommendation that the suffering be treated as real and clinically managed.

systematic review2018contested

Last verified 12 August 2026.

Authors
Agence nationale de sécurité sanitaire de l'alimentation, de l'environnement et du travail (ANSES)
Year
2018
Design
systematic review
Exposure studied
Self-declared sensitivity to electromagnetic fields across sources, in France
Place in the evidence base
contested
Primary document
https://www.anses.fr/fr/system/files/AP2011SA0150Ra.pdf

Finding

In the current state of knowledge there is no solid experimental evidence establishing a causal link between EMF exposure and the symptoms described by people declaring themselves EHS. ANSES simultaneously states that their suffering and pain correspond to a lived reality that leads them to adapt their daily lives, recommends appropriate clinical care and training for health professionals, and calls for further research whose experimental conditions reflect how affected people actually live.

What it cannot establish

An evidence review, not new experimental work; it inherits the limitations of the provocation literature it assesses. It makes no finding about any exposure threshold and does not support treating the precautionary EMF values published by clinical associations as health-based limits.

Related records

  • ANSES (Agence nationale de sécurité sanitaire, France)

    The French health and environment agency, which devoted a dedicated collective expert review to electromagnetic hypersensitivity: its 2018 report found no solid experimental evidence of a causal link while calling the reported suffering real and recommending clinical care and further research.

    Organizations

  • Rubin et al. 2010 — updated systematic review of EHS provocation studies

    46 blind or double-blind provocation experiments with 1175 self-reported sensitive volunteers: no robust evidence that field exposure triggered their symptoms, and support for a nocebo mechanism instead.

    Research record

  • What should I do if I think I'm electrosensitive?

    Have the symptoms evaluated clinically, measure before you buy anything, and remove cheap exposures first. Don't treat precautionary guideline values as health-based limits or shield before measuring.

    Direct answers

Sources

  1. anses-2018-ehs Avis et rapport d'expertise collective — Hypersensibilité électromagnétique ou intolérance environnementale idiopathique attribuée aux champs électromagnétiques (mars 2018) Agence nationale de sécurité sanitaire de l'alimentation, de l'environnement et du travail (ANSES), France, 2018. government, link checked 2026-08-12.
  2. anses-2018-ehs-summary Hypersensibilité aux ondes électromagnétiques : amplifier l'effort de recherche et adapter la prise en charge des personnes concernées ANSES, France, 2018. government, link checked 2026-08-12.

Same record, other formats